After a court determined that Google had had an oppressive monopoly for the previous ten years, U.S. officials want a federal judge to disband the firm so it can stop stifling competition with its dominant search engine.
In a 23-page statement submitted late Wednesday, the U.S. Justice Department outlined the proposed split, which calls for Google to sell its market-leading Chrome web browser and implement measures to stop its Android smartphone software from favoring its search engine.
Following an August order by U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta that labeled Google a monopolist, the suggested sanctions highlight how harshly regulators working under President Joe Biden feel Google should be penalized. Decision-makers in the Justice Department who will take up the case once President-elect Donald Trump assumes office next year may not be as adamant.Mehta hopes to make his final ruling before Labor Day, and the court hearings on Google’s punishment are set to start in April in Washington, D.C.
Google will most likely fight the penalties if Mehta accepts the Justice Department’s recommendations, extending a court battle that has lasted for more than four years.
The Justice Department wants the judge to prohibit Google from entering into multibillion-dollar agreements to lock in its dominating search engine as the default option on Apple’s iPhone and other devices, in addition to pursuing a Chrome spinoff and snatching up Android software.
Regulators also want Google to provide its competitors access to the data it gathers from user queries so they may more effectively compete with the tech behemoth.
The actions, if implemented, have the potential to topple a firm that is predicted to make over $300 billion this year and has provided Alphabet Inc., the parent company of Google, with a lucrative machine.
According to the Justtice Department’s recommendations, Google’s actions have created an uneven playing field, and the company’s quality reflects the illegally obtained advantage. The solution must eliminate this disparity and deny Google these benefits.
There is still a chance that the Justice Department may slow down its efforts to dismantle Google, particularly if Trump replaces Jonathan Kanter, who Biden nominated to lead the department’s antitrust section.
Kanter oversaw the high-profile trial that resulted in Mehta’s decision against Google, despite the fact that the complaint against the company was initially filed in the last months of Trump’s first term in office. Together with Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan, Kanter adopted a tough-on-Big Tech approach that deterred commercial transactions during the previous four years and led to additional attempts at crackdowns on industry titans like Apple.
Trump recently voiced worries that a split may ruin Google, but he didn’t go into detail about the other sanctions he might be considering. Trump stated last month that you can make it more equitable without tearing it up. Trump’s nominee for the future U.S. Attorney General, Matt Gaetz, a former Republican congressman, has called for the dissolution of Big Tech companies.
Trump firebrand Gaetz is facing a challenging confirmation hearing.
Kanter and his team had one last opportunity to outline the steps they believe are necessary to restore competition in search with this most recent filing. It occurs six weeks after Justice originally suggested a breakup in an initial draft of possible sanctions.
However, the question of whether regulators aim to impose controls that go beyond the topics discussed in the trial last year and, consequently, Mehta’s decision is already being raised by Kanter’s proposal.
Google now spends over $26 billion a year to maintain one of the primary practices that bothered Mehta in his decision: banning the default search deals.
It’s unclear if the judge will agree with the Justice Department’s argument that Android should be separated from Google’s other services and Chrome should be thrown out of the firm.
The attempt to dismantle Google is reminiscent of a similar penalty that was first applied to Microsoft 25 years ago during a significant antitrust lawsuit in which a federal judge found that the software developer had unlawfully used his Windows operating system for PCs to suppress competition.
But an order that would have dismantled Microsoft was overruled by an appeals court, setting a precedent that many analysts predict will make Mehta hesitant to follow in the Google case.
The Associated Press, 2024. All rights reserved. All rights reserved. It is prohibited to publish, broadcast, rewrite, or redistribute this content without authorization.
Note: Thank you for visiting our website! We strive to keep you informed with the latest updates based on expected timelines, although please note that we are not affiliated with any official bodies. Our team is committed to ensuring accuracy and transparency in our reporting, verifying all information before publication. We aim to bring you reliable news, and if you have any questions or concerns about our content, feel free to reach out to us via email. We appreciate your trust and support!