New study shows voting for Native Americans is harder than ever

According to a recent study, there are significant differences in Native American turnout, especially for presidential elections, because of structural obstacles to voting on tribal territories.

The Brennan Center for Justice published the analysis on Tuesday. It examined 21 states with federally recognized tribal territory where at least 5,000 people live and where over 20% of the population is American Indian or Alaska Native. Researchers discovered that among those residing off tribal territory in the same states, voter turnout in federal elections was 15% lower in presidential elections and 7% lower in midterm elections between 2012 and 2022.

According to the Brennan Center, the most recent data revealed that voter turnout was lowest on tribal grounds with a high population of Native Americans, despite previous studies showing that turnout for communities of color is higher in regions where their ethnic group is the majority.

According to Chelsea Jones, one of the study’s researchers, there is something more intense going on in Native American communities on tribal grounds.

According to Jones, the study indicates that certain obstacles might be unbreakable in communities with a large Native population since there aren’t enough polling stations or early or mail-in ballots available. Voting by mail is made much more challenging by the fact that many people living on tribal territories have unconventional addresses, which do not include house numbers or street names.Because of this, a large number of Native American voters use P.O. boxes; however, the report points out that certain jurisdictions do not mail ballots to P.O. boxes.

See also  Man killed in Tuskegee University shooting in Alabama is identified. 16 others were hurt

Native American voters face additional challenges due to the long commutes to the polling places that are located on tribal territories and the lack of public transit.

It is a very restrictive situation to be in when you consider that residents of tribal territories must travel 30, 60, or even 100 miles (up to 160 kilometers) in order to vote, Jones added. These are very, very serious obstacles.

Jones said that they discovered that in a number of locations, including states where it is lawful, Native American voters were not permitted to cast ballots using their tribe identification cards. According to Jones, all of these ballot-related obstacles may foster mistrust of the system and result in decreased turnout.

The Brennan Center report also emphasizes a persistent problem with comprehending how or why Native Americans cast their ballots: a dearth of reliable data.

When it comes to researching Native American communities, particularly in relation to politics, there are significant data disparities, Jones stated.

Dr. Stephanie Fryberg, director of the Research for Indigenous Social Action & Equity Center, which examines systemic inequalities faced by Indigenous people, stated that Native American communities are frequently left out of polling data and that when they are included, the studies do not always reflect broader trends for Indigenous voters.

According to Fryberg, a psychology professor at Northwestern University, polling is often not in a strong position to serve Indian Country. Some theories that are promoted as the best practices for polling don’t apply to Indian Country because of the location and the challenges of interacting with members of our community.

See also  Republican Young Kim wins reelection to U.S. House in California’s 40th Congressional District

Fryberg, a member of Washington State’s Tulalip Tribe, was among a number of Indigenous experts who criticized a recent Edison Research exit poll that revealed 65% of participating Native American voters supported Donald Trump. None of the jurisdictions in the poll were on tribal territories, and the poll only polled 229 self-identified Native Americans, a sample size she claimed is too tiny for an accurate assessment.

According to Fryberg, you’re already removing a potent viewpoint there.

That polling data has caused a lot of confusion, according to the Indigenous Journalists Association, which called it extremely irresponsible and deceptive.

The survey’s objective is to represent the national electorate and have enough data to also look at significant demographic and geographic subgroups, Edison Research acknowledged in a statement to the Associated Press, despite the polling sample being tiny. The disclaimer states that the poll has a possible sample margin of error of plus or minus 9%.

“This data point from our survey should not be taken as a definitive word on the American Indian vote based on all of these factors,” the statement says.

As citizens of sovereign nations, Native Americans have political identities in addition to belonging to an ethnic group. “Data cannot accurately capture voting trends for those communities if respondents are allowed to self-identify as Native Americans without being asked follow-up questions about tribal membership and specific Indigenous populations,” Fryberg added.

According to both Fryberg and Jones, academics and legislators would need to address the unique needs of Indigenous communities in order to improve statistics about and voting possibilities for Native Americans. Jones stated that fair in-person voting choices would be provided in each precinct on tribal territory if the Native American Voting Rights Act, a bill that has stalled in Congress, were passed.

See also  What Republicans are saying about Matt Gaetz’s nomination for attorney general

According to Jones, this is not a problem that exists nationwide. It is unique to tribal territory. Therefore, we require measures that specifically address that.

___

Graham Lee Brewer is a member of the AP’s Race & Ethnicity team who lives in Oklahoma City.

The Associated Press, 2024. All rights reserved. All rights reserved. It is prohibited to publish, broadcast, rewrite, or redistribute this content without authorization.

Note: Thank you for visiting our website! We strive to keep you informed with the latest updates based on expected timelines, although please note that we are not affiliated with any official bodies. Our team is committed to ensuring accuracy and transparency in our reporting, verifying all information before publication. We aim to bring you reliable news, and if you have any questions or concerns about our content, feel free to reach out to us via email. We appreciate your trust and support!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *